Cost, delivery and flexibility

The MIM cost equation involves several factors ranging from alloy to packaging requirements.

 

Tooling cost

At the beginning, tool cost is a barrier, especially if the design is not fully worked out. In this regard MIM tends to project an inflexible character. For example, a sophisticated four-cavity mould    used in cell phone production costs more than $30,000 each.

Any reworking of that mould to change the design is a cost and time barrier. A few vendors have innovated means to reduce the time and cost for the first mould, including use of polyurethane or aluminium moulds. Curiously, it appears that only half of the moulds created for MIM ever go into production.

Mould cost in MIM tends to be highly variable. In one case, eight vendors quoted prices for the same mould that ranged from $27,000 to $70,000, and delivery times from 8 to 12 weeks. This says that diligence is required to sort out the various claims and determine the best options when ordering tooling.

Since many firms formulate their own feedstock to keep down production costs, a mould customised to that feedstock is not necessarily useable by another firm.

 

Influence of feedstock price

Part costs are dominated by feedstock price. Table 4 is a contrast of component costs between two vendors on the same part, where vendor A uses self-mixing and vendor B relies on purchased premixed feedstock (values are dollars per part). Such a table shows how feedstock cost goes right to the bottom line. Note, that if vendor A adopted continuous processing in debinding and sintering (such as used by vendor B), then the potential component cost would drop to $0.76.

In a sensitivity analysis for MIM part cost [7], it was determine that feedstock cost was the most important factor. It was followed by component mass, process yield and other production factors. Clearly, designs that remove mass and ensure high process yields lead to the greatest success.

Factor Vendor A Vendor B Notes
Feedstock 0.35 0.67 Vendor B purchases pre-mixed feedstock
Moulding 0.17 0.37 Vendor A is in a lower labor rate area
Tooling 0.13 0.13 No difference
Debinding 0.11 0.04 Vendor A relies on batch processing
Sintering 0.34 0.07 Vendor B relies on continuous processing
Piece cost 1.10 1.28 Vendor A gets the job

Table 4 Contrast of component costs between two vendors on the same part, where vendor A uses self-mixing and vendor B relies on purchased premixed feedstock (values are US$ per part)

 

Continue to next page: Overview: key criteria for selecting MIM technology

 

In the latest issue of PIM International…

Download PDF

Extensive MIM, CIM industry and sinter-based AM industry news, plus the following exclusive deep-dive articles and reports:

  • Calling all product designers: Discover what Metal Injection Moulding could do for you through these award-winning parts
  • Binder Jetting of a dual-phase steel: Process insight and optimisation using the Master Sintering Curve
  • The rise of filament-based metal AM: New materials and machines present opportunities for MIM producers
  • Sinter-based Additive Manufacturing at the 20th Plansee Seminar on Refractory Metals and Hard Materials
  • Ceramitec 2022: Opportunities abound for producers of technical ceramics by CIM and AM

The latest news from the MIM, CIM and sinter-based AM industries

Don't miss any new issue of PIM International, and stay up to date with the latest industry news. Sign up to our fortnightly newsletter.

Sign up

News from the industry…

    Discover our magazine archive…

    The free-to-access PIM International magazine archive offers unparalleled insight into the world of MIM, CIM and sinter-based AM from a commercial and technological perspective through:

    • Reports on visits to leading part manufacturers and industry suppliers
    • Articles on technology and application trends
    • Information on materials developments
    • Reviews of key technical presentations from the international conference circuit
    • International industry news

    All past issues are available to download as free PDFs or view in your browser.

     

    Browse the archive

     

    Looking for suppliers of materials, production equipment and finished MIM, CIM or sinter-based AM parts?

    Discover suppliers of these and more in our advertisers’ index and buyer’s guide, available in the back of PIM International.

    • Metal powders
    • MIM, CIM & AM parts producers
    • Binders & feedstocks
    • Feedstock mixers
    • Furnaces & furnace supplies
    • Atmospheres & gas generation
    • HIP systems & services
    • Injection moulding machines
    • AM technology
    • Debinding systems
    Download PDF
    Copy link
    Powered by Social Snap