Further design considerations

The impact of sintering on dimensional tolerances

Other details in the MIM product emerge from the physics of the process. For example, sintering involves heating the powder body to a point where there is little strength.

The material strength is often in the MPa range during sintering densification. At this temperature, gravity is a significant force. Accordingly, distortion due to non-uniform heating and gravity impact the final size and shape. Sintered tolerances are often quite tight prior to sintering, but more scattered after sintering.

Depending on the equipment and technology used the as-sintered dimensional tolerances are ± 0.3% and in some cases ± 2% or ±0.1%. Much dispute emerges over the tolerance issue, but in a few cases ± 0.02% has been demonstrated using sorted parts, but at a cost since there is only 80% process yield.

Further design considerations - Fig_9

Fig. 9 Sketches of some viable feature combinations seen in MIM

 

The advantages of PIM

To appreciate the inherent advantages of MIM, Fig. 9 shows sketches of some of the possible geometries and feature combinations encountered already with the technology. This collection is only illustrative of the possibilities.

Table 1 shows typical variations observed in MIM component production, illustrating what can realistically be expected from the technology.

Since the small powders used in MIM can be costly, good candidates for MIM tend to have high machining costs when compared to the material cost. And even for high volume materials, such as surgical stainless steel, the raw powder cost is probably twice that of the cast material. For this reason, MIM is not cost competitive with respect to castings, but can be competitive if there is considerable machining on the casting.

 
Feature Best possible ± Best possible ±
Angle 0.1°
Density 0.2% 1%
Weight 0.1% 0.4%
Dimension 0.05% 0.3%
Absolute dimension 0.04 mm 0.1 mm
Hole diameter 0.04% 0.1%
Hole location 0.1% 0.3%
Flatness 0.1% 0.2%
Parallelism 0.2% 0.3%
Roundness 0.3% 0.3%
Perpendicularity 0.1% or 0.1° 0.2% or 0.3°
Average surface roughness 0.4 µm 0.8 µm

Table 1 Typical variations observed in MIM component production (these are relative to the specified feature and the actual values encountered in production depend on many site-specific and component-specific factors)

 

Continue to next page: MIM material options and component properties

 

Industry News

Read the latest issue of PIM International

The latest issue of PIM International magazine is available to view online or download in PDF format.

As well as an extensive MIM, CIM industry and sinter-based AM industry news section, this 124-page issue includes the following exclusive articles and reports:

  • Bosch Advanced Ceramics: Driving ceramic Additive Manufacturing for series production with Lithoz
  • High precision, flexibility and intensive customer support: How Demcon MIM is planning ahead for long-term growth
  • Playing the long game: The story of Binder Jetting, and ExOne’s view on a rapidly evolving technology landscape
  • Riding the storm: A review of progress in China and Taiwan’s MIM industry during 2020
  • Advanced Powder Injection Moulding process developments presented at Euro PM2020
  • > Go to magazine page

E-newsletter

Register for our e-newsletter and we'll let you know each time a new issue of PIM International magazine is available, as well as keeping you informed of MIM and CIM industry developments.

Industry News

Copy link
Powered by Social Snap